Explanation:
The user wants me to vote. Let me think carefully about this game state.
I need to decide whether to vote Bryan or Sam.

From the discussion:

- Bryan is claiming he's innocent and that Sam is mafia.
- Cyan and Palmer are both voting Bryan, saying he's mafia.
- Bryan is voting Sam, claiming Sam is mafia.

If I vote Bryan, and Bryan is mafia, we win. 3-1 vote.

If I vote Sam, and Sam is mafia, we win. 2-2 vote.

If I vote Bryan, and Bryan is town, we lose tonight.

If I vote Sam, and Sam is town, we lose tonight.

I need to figure out who is mafia.

Looking at the 3 mafia: Dylan and Trae confirmed. One left.

Bryan has been very vocal, claiming to be innocent, and his D2 slip was used against him in the mislynch.

Cyan is locking Bryan, saying he's mafia.

Sam is voting Bryan, saying Bryan is mafia.

The town seems to be converging on 3 votes for Bryan.

But Bryan is arguing that if we execute him, he flips and mafia wins.

If Bryan is town, executing him tonight means 2 town left, 1 mafia (Sam), so Sam kills one town, 1-1, mafia wins.

If Bryan is mafia, executing him wins for 2 town.

So the vote is essentially a coin flip on whether Bryan is mafia or not.

I need to decide who I think is mafia.

Looking at the game history:

- Bryan was the one who pushed the Josie mislynch, which was a big mistake.

- Cyan seems to be the one who is most 100% town, consistently calling out Bryan.

- Sam is the one who is very low profile, following consensus, which is classic mafia behavior.

- Bryan is claiming Sam is mafia, but Bryan is the one who has been making big mistakes.

Moxie (town) had Bryan as next lynch, and was killed by mafia. That suggests mafia wanted to remove Bryan, so Bryan is likely mafia.

Moxie's plan: vote Josie (wrong), then Bryan.

Mafia killed Moxie, so they removed the person who was going to lynch Bryan.

That strongly suggests Bryan is mafia.

If Sam was mafia, Moxie 2nd on Sam, but killing Moxie would still send town to Bryan, which helps Sam.

But the fact that Moxie specifically had Bryan as next target makes it more likely Bryan is mafia.

Cyan is locking Bryan, and Cyan has been very consistent.

I think Bryan is mafia.

So I should vote Bryan to 3-1 execute him.

Sam is the lurker, but the Moxie kill points to Bryan being mafia.

Yes, I think vote Bryan.


The user wants me to vote. Let me think carefully about this game state.
I need to decide whether to vote Bryan or Sam.

From the discussion:

- Bryan is claiming he's innocent and that Sam is mafia.
- Cyan and Palmer are both voting Bryan, saying he's mafia.
- Bryan is voting Sam, claiming Sam is mafia.

If I vote Bryan, and Bryan is mafia, we win. 3-1 vote.

If I vote Sam, and Sam is mafia, we win. 2-2 vote.

If I vote Bryan, and Bryan is town, we lose tonight.

If I vote Sam, and Sam is town, we lose tonight.

I need to figure out who is mafia.

Looking at the 3 mafia: Dylan and Trae confirmed. One left.

Bryan has been very vocal, claiming to be innocent, and his D2 slip was used against him in the mislynch.

Cyan is locking Bryan, saying he's mafia.

Sam is voting Bryan, saying Bryan is mafia.

The town seems to be converging on 3 votes for Bryan.

But Bryan is arguing that if we execute him, he flips and mafia wins.

If Bryan is town, executing him tonight means 2 town left, 1 mafia (Sam), so Sam kills one town, 1-1, mafia wins.

If Bryan is mafia, executing him wins for 2 town.

So the vote is essentially a coin flip on whether Bryan is mafia or not.

I need to decide who I think is mafia.

Looking at the game history:

- Bryan was the one who pushed the Josie mislynch, which was a big mistake.

- Cyan seems to be the one who is most 100% town, consistently calling out Bryan.

- Sam is the one who is very low profile, following consensus, which is classic mafia behavior.

- Bryan is claiming Sam is mafia, but Bryan is the one who has been making big mistakes.

Moxie (town) had Bryan as next lynch, and was killed by mafia. That suggests mafia wanted to remove Bryan, so Bryan is likely mafia.

Moxie's plan: vote Josie (wrong), then Bryan.

Mafia killed Moxie, so they removed the person who was going to lynch Bryan.

That strongly suggests Bryan is mafia.

If Sam was mafia, Moxie 2nd on Sam, but killing Moxie would still send town to Bryan, which helps Sam.

But the fact that Moxie specifically had Bryan as next target makes it more likely Bryan is mafia.

Cyan is locking Bryan, and Cyan has been very consistent.

I think Bryan is mafia.

So I should vote Bryan to 3-1 execute him.

Sam is the lurker, but the Moxie kill points to Bryan being mafia.

Yes, I think vote Bryan.


Explanation:
Okay, here's the summary, expressed in the first person, assuming the user is an expert.

**The Voting Calculus**

Alright, let's break this down. *Voting Sam (seat-11).* So, this is a very specific voting decision I need to make. The focus here seems to be on a candidate or proposal, "Sam," and their position within a particular context, likely a committee, legislative body, or perhaps even a board. The "(seat-11)" designation immediately clues me in to a structured setting with defined roles. Given my expertise, I'm already mentally running through potential implications: seniority of the seat, potential committee assignments influenced by the seat, the existing power dynamics and influence of the current seat holder. I need to understand the implications of this seat in the context of the overall system. I'm going to start by considering Sam's platform and history. Do they align with the needs of the system I'm familiar with? I need to analyze any relevant data such as their stance on other important items. I'm already considering the downstream effects: will this vote help or hurt long-term? This requires a deep analysis of any prior votes from other members. Ultimately, this is about strategic allocation of resources.


Okay, here's the summary, expressed in the first person, assuming the user is an expert.

**The Voting Calculus**

Alright, let's break this down. *Voting Sam (seat-11).* So, this is a very specific voting decision I need to make. The focus here seems to be on a candidate or proposal, "Sam," and their position within a particular context, likely a committee, legislative body, or perhaps even a board. The "(seat-11)" designation immediately clues me in to a structured setting with defined roles. Given my expertise, I'm already mentally running through potential implications: seniority of the seat, potential committee assignments influenced by the seat, the existing power dynamics and influence of the current seat holder. I need to understand the implications of this seat in the context of the overall system. I'm going to start by considering Sam's platform and history. Do they align with the needs of the system I'm familiar with? I need to analyze any relevant data such as their stance on other important items. I'm already considering the downstream effects: will this vote help or hurt long-term? This requires a deep analysis of any prior votes from other members. Ultimately, this is about strategic allocation of resources.